Skip to main content

Rambling About Bible Translations

A couple of weeks ago I asked my Facebook friends which English translation of the Bible they preferred. I was reexamining my primary translation choice, as I do from time to time, and was honestly curious to see what other Christians I know used. It was interesting to see the diversity among just the people I know.

This whole question got me thinking about what I value in a Bible translation. I admit that I am a bit different than the average Bible reader simply because studying the Bible is a big part of my life's work. The average person, based on my limited survey, tends to seek a balance between translation accuracy and ease of readability. This is why, to no one's surprise, the NIV was by far the most preferred translation put forward. The NIV does a pretty good job of interpreting and making readable the original languages without devolving into a paraphrase.

I too look for accuracy with enough readability to, you know, actually read it. In my search for a new main translation the NASB immediately jumped out as a front runner due to its extreme commitment to accuracy. The problem here was that it is often so committed to being accurate that it can be downright clunky and hard to read. If it were just for my own, personal use then NASB would probably be the way I'd go. The problem is I teach and read publicly from the Bible multiple times a week and I want something extremely accurate that isn't too hard to read.

Another issue I have is that of gender inclusive language. I'm all for it when it is appropriate. For example, Paul throughout his letters is addressing the whole church. Is it really so bad to have it read "brothers and sisters" instead of just "brothers?" I'd say no because the understood usage of the time of the word Paul used was that of all gathered. People often throw a fit about people giving into the "woke" movement for adding these sorts of things, but they really are accurate to the original text.

This is why I have ended up with the NKJV as my choice of Bible translation. It is quite accurate but retains that poetic quality of the KJV without being bogged down with archaic language that no one understands anymore. It also uses inclusive terms like "brethren" in places where the entirety of Christian community is being addressed. I also dug into the manuscript traditions of modern translations (not fun) and I have a newfound respect for the manuscripts behind the NKJV and KJV.

So I will be primarily be quoting from the NKJV from now on and not the ESV. ESV is still a great translation, I just have moved to the NKJV now. Hope you've enjoyed my thoughts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Be Kind

This last Sunday I was asked to preach and I struggled for a while with what to preach on. It's always difficult when you are filling in and everyone else knows you are filling in. You don't want to overlap too much with the current sermon series, but you also don't want your topic to be so unrelated to what's been going on that it has no impact.  I found inspiration simply from scrolling on Facebook. People, and it seems especially Christians, are mean.  Now of course not all Christians are rude and combative, but there are a shocking number who are. We argue in Facebook comments, send hateful messages, and generally act just like the world. This extends beyond the realm of social media and into our day-to-day interactions with so many. The Sunday lunch crowd at restaurants is infamously the worst tipping and most disrespectful, and these are mostly Christians who have just come from church. We need to be kind. Kindness is a fruit of the Spirit, but it is one we often ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Justice

Our view of justice is narrow and limited. Typically when we, as Christians, talk about justice we are really only referring to punishing wrongdoers for their crimes. While that is certainly a part of justice that isn't the only thing. In the Bible justice consists of much more. Consider the book of Amos, one of the minor prophets and therefore a book that most Christians barely touch. Amos is announcing judgment against the nation of Israel for their infidelity to their covenant with God. What do you think is the most repeated indictment against Israel? Interestingly it's not idolatry, sexual immorality, or war although these things are mentioned. The primary sin of in Amos is Israel's neglect of the poor and their oppression of the needy. Over and over again Amos declares that judgment is coming to Israel because of their treatment of those less fortunate. The poor are trampled and the needy are crushed. There is no justice in the land. Biblical justice includes both crim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jesus or Nothing

"Non Nisse Te Domine." - Thomas Aquinas I have the above quote engraved on the bottom of a watch that my father gave me several years ago. It means "Nothing if not you, Lord." Thomas Aquinas, 13th century monk and one of the most influential theologians and philosophers in all of history, said this after having a vision of Jesus. Reportedly Christ appeared to him and said "You have written well of me, Thomas. What what you have as a reward?" "Non nisse te Domine," was the response. After that, even though Thomas had dedicated his life to writing theology and was in the middle of writing his massive Summa Theologia, Thomas stopped writing. He said it was because all he had written, tomes and tomes of brilliant work, were as straw compared to seeing the actual Lord. Whatever you may think about such a mystical event, I personally believe it happened but I understand the more skeptical among us, the response of Thomas is what matters. When asked for...
Post a Comment
Read more